MaintainX and UpKeep are the two most commonly shortlisted mobile CMMS platforms for teams moving off paper or spreadsheets. Independently verified data from Capterra, last updated March 17, 2026, puts MaintainX at 4.8 stars across 993 reviews with a starting price of $25 per month, and UpKeep at 4.6 stars across 1,320 reviews with a starting price of $20 per month. In practice, MaintainX tends to win on mobile simplicity and technician adoption speed, while UpKeep tends to win on native reporting depth and third-party integrations. Neither platform was originally built around the specific needs of multi-location facilities operations, portfolio-level reporting, vendor and budget controls, and compliance tracking across many sites, which is worth knowing before you commit to either one.
The basics
MaintainX was founded in 2018 and is based in Miami, Florida. It is a mobile-first CMMS built around a chat-style interface, with in-app messaging, work order templates, and AI features aimed at reducing the time it takes a technician to log and close a job. As of early 2026, MaintainX reported more than 14,000 customer organizations and over 500,000 frontline users, and the company was acquired by Autodesk in May 2026 in an all-cash deal valued at approximately $3.6 billion.
UpKeep was founded in 2014 and is based in Los Angeles, California. It positions itself as a broader asset operations management platform, with work order management, preventive maintenance, IoT integrations, and modules for safety (EHS/OSHA), fleet, and a no-code app builder called Nova Apps, alongside its Nova AI assistant.
Pricing
Public starting prices, verified through Capterra as of March 2026, put MaintainX at $25 per month and UpKeep at $20 per month at the entry tier, a difference of $5 per month at the lowest published rate. Both companies also publish mid-tier and Enterprise plans with custom pricing, so the entry-level number is a useful reference point but not the full picture for a mid-size or multi-location deployment.
The more important pricing detail for a multi-location buyer is what each vendor gates behind its higher tiers rather than the sticker price of the entry plan. MaintainX gates single sign-on, IoT integrations, and multi-site reporting behind its Enterprise tier, and its Premium plan runs on a per-user model that compounds quickly at scale, a 50-seat Premium deployment can exceed $39,000 per year before Enterprise add-ons, based on public pricing analysis. UpKeep's own comparison materials claim that AI features, custom reporting, and its Nova Apps builder are included in its standard plans rather than sold as paid add-ons, and that view-only seats for leadership or finance staff are free. That claim comes from UpKeep's own marketing pages rather than independent verification, so it is worth confirming directly with UpKeep's sales team against your specific seat count and site count before treating it as settled.
Where MaintainX tends to be stronger
Reviewers consistently credit MaintainX with a simpler, faster mobile experience. On Capterra, MaintainX scores 4.8 on ease of use against UpKeep's 4.6, and its reviews sentiment breakdown, 976 positives out of 993 total, skews slightly more positive than UpKeep's 1,270 positive out of 1,320 total. MaintainX's chat-style interface and real-time in-app messaging, available on every plan including its free tier, are frequently cited as reasons frontline technicians adopt it quickly with minimal training. MaintainX also offers workload-based scheduling that factors in labor capacity, and AI features aimed at procedure generation, anomaly detection, and voice-to-text work order notes.
Where UpKeep tends to be stronger
UpKeep's own materials, corroborated in part by third-party comparison sites, describe a deeper asset hierarchy, up to four levels compared with MaintainX's two, more customizable reporting dashboards, and broader native integration support, connecting to more than 1,000 systems through native connections, Zapier, and a public API. UpKeep also bundles adjacent modules, safety and EHS incident tracking, fleet management, and an IoT integration layer, that MaintainX does not offer natively. Independent comparison coverage from Facilio notes that if asset data depth, including lifecycle tracking, inventory costing, and depreciation, matters more to your team than communication speed, UpKeep's asset management tools are generally considered the stronger option at comparable pricing tiers.
What neither platform was built to solve
This is the part of the comparison most vendor-published pages skip, because neither vendor benefits from raising it. Independent coverage from Facilio makes the point directly: neither MaintainX nor UpKeep was designed from the ground up for multi-site portfolio operations managing tenants, vendors, compliance requirements, and budget controls across many locations at once. Four specific gaps show up consistently for multi-location and mid-size facilities teams evaluating either platform:
-
Portfolio-level rollup reporting. Cross-site visibility is an Enterprise-tier feature on MaintainX rather than a standard capability, and while UpKeep offers more native reporting depth generally, neither platform was purpose-built around comparing performance across dozens of locations at once.
-
Vendor and budget controls. Coordinating outside vendors and contractors with not-to-exceed (NTE) budget limits, purchase approvals, and vendor performance tracking across many sites is not a core strength of either platform; both are primarily internal work order and technician communication tools first.
-
External and tenant-facing intake. Neither platform's messaging system is designed for external vendor or tenant service request intake by default, which matters for property portfolios, retail chains, and multi-tenant facilities managing requests from outside their own internal team.
-
Compliance and audit trail depth at scale. Both platforms support basic preventive maintenance scheduling and documentation, but neither was purpose-built around the audit trail and statutory compliance tracking requirements that regulated, multi-site organizations, healthcare systems, food service chains, and multi-campus education, typically need.
Which one fits which team
For a single site or a small number of sites where the priority is getting technicians to actually log their work quickly, MaintainX's simpler mobile experience and faster onboarding are a reasonable fit, and its free tier makes it easy to trial before committing. For a team that has outgrown basic work order tracking and needs deeper asset lifecycle data, more flexible reporting, or bundled safety and fleet modules, UpKeep's broader feature set is likely to cover more ground without adding a second tool. For a multi-location or mid-size organization managing vendors, budgets, and compliance across many sites at once, both platforms are worth evaluating on their individual strengths, but neither was built specifically around that use case, which is worth factoring into a renewal or new-vendor decision regardless of which one you choose.
LeanSite is an AI-powered facilities management platform built specifically for multi-location and mid-size organizations, so it sits closer to the fourth scenario above than the first two. Multi-site rollup reporting, vendor management, and budget/not-to-exceed tracking are core to the base platform rather than an add-on, and its AI assistant, Vera, is built to take action on service requests and vendor invoices rather than only surface data. That's a genuinely different starting point than either MaintainX or UpKeep, not a claim that it replaces what either one does well for a single site or a smaller team.
If you're weighing this decision for your own portfolio and want a second set of eyes on the specific criteria that matter for your sites, that's usually a short conversation and there's no pressure either way.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, MaintainX or UpKeep? At the entry tier, UpKeep's published starting price is $20 per month against MaintainX's $25 per month, based on Capterra data verified in March 2026. At higher tiers and seat counts, the actual cost depends heavily on which features are bundled versus gated, so the entry price alone is not a reliable predictor of total cost for a multi-site deployment.
Which has better reviews, MaintainX or UpKeep? MaintainX holds a 4.8 average on Capterra across 993 reviews, and UpKeep holds a 4.6 average across 1,320 reviews, as of March 2026. MaintainX rates slightly higher on ease of use specifically, while UpKeep has a larger total review base.
Does MaintainX or UpKeep have better multi-site reporting? Both gate their most advanced reporting behind higher pricing tiers. MaintainX restricts multi-site reporting to its Enterprise tier, while UpKeep generally offers more customizable native reporting dashboards across its plans, though neither platform was purpose-built around portfolio-level, multi-location visibility as its primary design goal.
Is MaintainX or UpKeep easier to onboard? MaintainX is more commonly cited for fast technician adoption due to its simpler, chat-style mobile interface, while UpKeep's broader feature set generally comes with a steeper initial learning curve, according to independent comparison coverage.
Which one has stronger AI features? MaintainX's AI features focus on procedure generation, anomaly detection, and voice-to-text work order notes. UpKeep's Nova AI is built into its standard plans and paired with a no-code app builder, Nova Apps, for building custom workflows. Neither platform's AI is currently designed to autonomously execute multi-step tasks such as full invoice validation against a budget; both function primarily as assistive tools.
Should a multi-location facilities team choose MaintainX or UpKeep? Either can work for a multi-location team with modest cross-site coordination needs, but both were originally designed around single-site work order management rather than portfolio-wide vendor, budget, and compliance coordination. Teams with more complex multi-site requirements often evaluate platforms built specifically for that use case alongside MaintainX and UpKeep.
Written by Pelumi Akinwande, Operations Content Lead at LeanSite, who works directly with multi-site facilities and property operations teams evaluating work order software. Connect on LinkedIn.
